On The Line

The school program that meets the moment, not the fear. 

Something has shifted in how safe our community feels, and everyone can sense it. 
A run of serious incidents. 
Endless talk about "kids these days." 
A local MP standing up in Parliament to say what residents have been saying for months. 
People want something done - and they deserve a response built on what actually works, not on what feels satisfying in the moment. 


The Current Context
Here's what usually gets missed in the noise.

 Most of what's driving the concern isn't the rare serious crime that makes headlines, it's everyday anti-social behaviour that gets lumped in with it. That distinction matters, because it's also where the evidence is strongest for what actually works. 

Governments have tried the obvious answers before. 
Harsher penalties only ever apply after the harm is done.
By definition, they can't prevent what's already happened. 

Well-meaning "scared straight" style programs, which took at-risk teenagers on tours of adult prisons to shock them onto a better path, were eventually tested properly in the United States. 
The result surprised almost everyone: the kids who went through the program were more likely to reoffend afterwards, not less. 

On The Line

 Utilises a different approach - one built on decades of evidence about what actually changes a young person's trajectory, delivered by someone who has spent fifteen years doing exactly this work, across multiple settings.

On The Line


  1. Whole-school presentation. Every student has the opportunity to engage in one confronting, fast-moving session - no scare tactics, no lecturing. They leave having physically thrown away a symbol of what they'd risk losing, and having stood, if only for a moment, in a victim's shoes. It's the kind of session students talk about at lunch, not one they switch off for. 
  2. In-school identification process. A short, structured way for staff - who already know these students best - to identify who would benefit from extra support, without singling anyone out as "a problem." No young person is labelled a risk; the language throughout is about opportunity, not deficit.
  3. Targeted small-group program. The identified students go further, in a small group built specifically for them, building the thinking and self-control skills that sit underneath most repeat behaviour. A similar targeted program in the UK turned around the majority of the highest-risk young people referred to it.
  4.  Parent & carer handbook. Expanding the work and language beyond the school. Ss well as ten real conversations, and exactly how to have them - so a parent whose gut says something's off has the words for it, instead of silence or a lecture that shuts the conversation down. 
  5. Optional extra: Community engagement sessions. The same evidence-based approach, brought to parents, community groups and local forums - so the adults around these young people are working from the same page the young people are.
Why This Approach?

The instinct to come down hard is understandable.

It's also, on its own, been tried and shown not to work. 

The programs that do move the needle share a pattern: they match support to actual risk, they build real skills: problem solving, impulse control, seeing a situation from someone else's side.
They stick around long enough for it to take hold. 
Done properly, that combination has been shown to cut reoffending significantly. 

The whole-school piece matters just as much. 
Schools that run programs like this see calmer classrooms and better behaviour across the entire student body, not only among the small number singled out for extra help. 

Underneath all of it sits one idea that doesn't show up in most program brochures: skills only hold when a young person has something, and someone, worth using them for. 
That's why every part of On The Line is built around connection - to community, to family, to self, and to a sense of purpose - not just around managing risk. 

The evidence behind every claim on this page - including the research above is available upon request.

I've spent nearly two decades in the rooms most people only read about - secure youth custody, high-needs residential care, crisis and hostage negotiation, and years working directly with young people caught up in serious organised crime. 

I've sat with more young people than I can count on the other side of a single bad decision, watching the regret set in, hearing the same sentence more than once: "if I'd had this at school, I wouldn't be here".

 

That's the gap On The Line exists to close. 


Early in my career, I worked on a UK team responding to missing children, child sexual exploitation and modern slavery - mediating between young people and their families in the rawest moments imaginable. It taught me something that's shaped everything since: connection comes before information, every single time. You cannot lecture a young person back onto a good path. You can only reconnect them to the people, the community, and the sense of purpose that make staying on it worth the effort.

 I was later part of the founding team that designed and built Barnardo's Divert Project from the ground up - a joint partnership with St Giles and Crimestoppers' Fearless, split exactly the way On The Line is: one partner delivering intensive support, another delivering the whole-school piece. I helped shape its risk-assessment tool and methodology. In its first year, the partnership reported an 89% reduction in offending among the young people it worked with most closely. My work has also been recognised in publication  Street Craft: Stories from the Frontline of Justice Innovation (Centre for Justice Innovation, 2014).

 I hold a BA in Criminology, as well as specific further studies in Effective Practice in Youth Justice. Though none of this is just theory to me.

It's comes from watching what happens when someone is able to intervene in time 

and what happens when no one does.